Client Profile​​

A global technology enterprise with a large, mature patent portfolio spread across multiple jurisdictions.

 

Challenge

As annual renewal fees increased, the client needed a data‑driven, defensible approach to decide which patents to maintain and which to allow to lapse—without undermining strategic or competitive positioning.

​

Our Approach

• Performed a portfolio‑wide lapse and value review covering technical relevance, claim breadth, and market alignment.

• Assessed patents against current product lines, future roadmap, and competitive landscape.

• Identified high‑value core assets, strategic fence patents, and non‑essential filings.

• Provided clear renewal recommendations supported by objective scoring and qualitative insights.

• Worked closely with internal stakeholders to address edge cases and business sensitivities.

​

Outcome

   ✓ Clear identification of must‑renew vs. low‑value patents.

   ✓ Strategic patents preserved; non‑core assets allowed to lapse.

   ✓ Significant cost savings on annuities and maintenance.

   ✓ Improved visibility into portfolio strengths and gaps.

​

Business Impact
The client achieved a leaner, more purposeful patent portfolio, optimized for both cost efficiency and long‑term competitive value.